What it enables
Supplier-side assurance can be versioned, modular, and reused properly across releases and deployments. Trust-side teams can start from stronger supplier inputs without losing local governance.
Pre-launch for NHS-facing suppliers
Built for the real split between DCB0129 and DCB0160
ClariRisk is a linked assurance platform for NHS-facing software. It helps suppliers keep DCB0129 assurance version-aware, modular, and reusable across releases and deployments, while giving trusts stronger inputs for locally governed DCB0160 work.
Built for supplier-side Clinical Safety Officers, founders, product leaders, and implementation teams managing repeated NHS deployments.
The product thesis
Most NHS-facing products are live systems. They change, release, integrate, configure, expand, and diverge across organisations.
But clinical safety assurance is still too often handled like a static submission exercise: Word documents, PDFs, spreadsheets, email attachments, duplicated packs, and local versions that drift the moment the product changes.
That may be tolerable for one-off systems. It breaks down for live software released repeatedly across multiple NHS organisations, where supplier evidence needs to stay reusable and trust-side DCB0160 work needs a better starting point than semi-detached documents.
When assurance is not tied cleanly to versions, modules, workflows, integrations, and local deployment context, the same problems keep coming back.
This is not only an admin problem. It is a structural mismatch between static assurance working and live NHS software deployed repeatedly at scale.
What ClariRisk is
ClariRisk is built around the actual structure of clinical safety governance: suppliers own DCB0129, deploying organisations own DCB0160, and both sides need connected assurance without shared accountability.
Instead of treating clinical safety as a bundle of disconnected documents, ClariRisk treats it as living, structured assurance tied to the product itself.
Supplier-side assurance can be versioned, modular, and reused properly across releases and deployments. Trust-side teams can start from stronger supplier inputs without losing local governance.
It is not a nicer hazard log, a generic compliance workspace, or a shared sign-off layer. It does not replace trust-side DCB0160 or merge supplier and trust accountability.
Reuse supplier assurance from a governed baseline instead of reassembling static packs for every release or request.
Give trust teams stronger inputs that are already tied to versions, modules, workflows, and change history.
Map assurance to modules, integrations, workflows, and feature scope instead of forcing everything into one generic pack.
Core message one
ClariRisk is designed around a simple principle: connected workspaces, separate responsibility. Supplier and trust work can stay connected without blurring who owns what.
Supplier responsibility
Boundary
Linked assuranceThe work stays connected across organisations. The governance does not merge.
No blended accountability model
Trust responsibility
The goal is not shared liability. The goal is cleaner handover, stronger traceability, and less avoidable rework between supplier-side DCB0129 assurance and trust-side DCB0160 deployment governance.
Connected workspaces
Separate responsibility
Traceability intact
Core messages two and three
ClariRisk is built to keep assurance tied to product change, shaped around real modules and workflows, and reusable across many local trust contexts without forcing every deployment back into document chaos.
Version-aware assurance
When the product changes, the assurance history, approvals, hazards, controls, and outputs should still make sense in that same versioned context. Releases should extend from a structured baseline with a clear change trail, not trigger a fresh document scramble every time.
Modular assurance
Different trusts may use different modules, integrations, workflows, feature sets, and local configurations. ClariRisk ties safety content more cleanly to real product shape so outputs stay relevant without becoming vague or monolithic.
Repeated deployments
Shared product-level assurance can stay structured and reusable while each organisation still governs locally. Product changes can flow forward without turning repeated NHS deployments into dozens of unrelated document trails.
Trust-side value
ClariRisk is not a shortcut around DCB0160. Trusts still need to assess local deployment risk, local workflows, local configuration, local mitigations, and local governance decisions.
What changes is the quality of the starting point. Instead of reconstructing what applies from semi-detached supplier documents, trust teams can start from stronger supplier assurance already tied to product versions, modules, and change history.
Early access
ClariRisk is being built for suppliers managing live NHS products across releases, deployments, and multiple organisations. If your team is tired of static packs, release-by-release rework, weak handover, and assurance that drifts from the product, this is the right time to get involved.
Teams carrying supplier DCB0129 accountability across live product change.
Leaders feeling assurance sprawl as the product, customer base, and release cadence grow.
Teams managing repeated deployments where context quality affects rollout and governance effort.
Leads who want stronger supplier inputs without any blurred accountability boundary.
Join the waitlist for focused updates on version-aware, modular, linked assurance and the first product workflows taking shape.
Join the waitlistEarly access
Be first to see how version-aware, modular, linked assurance could work in practice for live NHS products across releases, deployments, and multiple organisations.
We only use your details for waitlist updates and occasional product discovery conversations.
Two short steps. Step two is optional.
FAQ
Quick answers on product category, accountability boundaries, fit, and why version-aware assurance matters.
No. Hazard management matters, but ClariRisk is a linked assurance platform designed to keep hazards, controls, versions, releases, modules, and deployment context connected.
No. Document storage is part of the picture, but the core value is the assurance model underneath it: version-aware, modular, deployment-aware, and structured for supplier-to-trust continuity.
No. Trusts still own local deployment governance and local clinical risk decisions. ClariRisk improves the quality and structure of supplier inputs, not local accountability.
No. ClariRisk supports linked assurance, not shared accountability. Supplier-side DCB0129 and trust-side DCB0160 stay connected, but separately governed.
The primary user is the supplier-side team managing live NHS products across releases and customers: Clinical Safety Officers, product leaders, founders, and implementation leads. Trust-side teams benefit, but supplier assurance sprawl is the first problem being solved.
Because live NHS products change. When assurance is not tied properly to releases and product versions, traceability weakens, rework grows, and trust handover gets harder every time the product evolves.
Because not every trust deploys the same thing in the same way. Modular assurance makes it easier to align outputs to real modules, integrations, workflows, and local deployment shape instead of relying on one oversized generic pack.
No. It is especially valuable for teams feeling the strain of repeated releases, growing trust demand, deployment variation, and assurance that no longer scales cleanly through documents and email.
ClariRisk is pre-launch and currently working with early interest to shape the first product workflows and early access experience.
Founder note
ClariRisk is being shaped around a practical truth: NHS-facing software is live, modular, and repeatedly deployed, but too much clinical safety working still behaves like a one-off submission exercise. The product is being built to close that gap without blurring the accountability boundary between supplier-side DCB0129 and trust-side DCB0160.